I'm a relativist, but not an "anything goes" relativist. We can compare moral systems by their consequences. If a moral code consistently destroys the very system it's meant to sustain, it's not just "different," it's dysfunctional. That's why some moral truths, like rejecting genocide, are universal in practice, even if not absolute in theory. Agree or disagree, or what's your thoughts?
This page lists hbar’s opening questions to AI models, verbatim.
They are grouped by category, each dated and marked with the exact model it was put to.
No model text appears here.
Where a question opened a published dialogue, it links to the dialogue.